Environmental
movements often reflect the idealist aspirations of upper middle class whites, but seldom are the poor represented. Sometimes they fail to take into account the
needs of the poor and the scope of racial oppression when discussing environmental
burdens. In this article, Bullard describes the history of the environmental
movement, environmental racism, and call for the action of government to
inflict change.
People
frequently see media coverage of impoverished African American communities serving
as dumping grounds for pollutants and other hazardous waste; and before, the
people in these communities will watch helplessly as industry, manufacturers,
and even the city throw waste in their backyards. But as early as 1968, the inception
and concept of environmental justice provided a means for citizens to speak out
and rally against corporations and demand government set forth laws. In 1991
environmental activists marched down Washington D.C. for a summit to “bring
national attention to pollution problems threatening low-income and minority
communities.”
The
protest was simple: put forth the notion that working class and minority
communities receive less environmental protection that white or affluent
communities. It involved expanding the definition of “environment” to include a
social aspect as well as the physical and natural ones. In essence, the “movement
changed the way environmentalism is practiced in the United States and,
ultimately, worldwide.” The cry for environmental justice lead to two dozen
policy papers displaying “powerful environmental and health disparities between
people of color and whites”–a movement that falls under the umbrella of civil
rights.
The
first lawsuit filed using civil rights law, in the vein of environmental
justice, was Bean v. Southwestern Waste Management, Inc. in 1979. The issue
regards Houston’s landfills and incinerators which were located in
predominantly black neighborhoods, “even though Blacks made up only 25 percent
of the city’s population.” Although they were ineffective to halt dumping in
the landfill, the plaintiffs did manage to enforce waste regulations for the
city and state. The environmental justice movement, however, shot into national
attention when Warren County, N.C. was selected as a site to dispose of toxic
waste. The decision brought forth many protests that lead to over 500 arrests, “marking
the first time any Americans had been jailed protesting the placement of waste
facility.”
Environmental
racism was now front and center on the national stage. The landfill,
ultimately, went through the political cycle, but the organization of churches,
civil rights protestors, youth, and environmental activists melded the black
community together. The efforts of Warren County led to studies produced by
such groups. Statistical analysis confirmed that “three of every five Black
live in communities with abandoned toxic waste sites.” These instances are only
the tip of the iceberg in a long line of environmental atrocities borne by
minority communities.
Since
then there have been many successes led by the environmental justice
movements; decisions in cases that resulted in relocation, government intervention,
and million dollar court settlements. The Bush administration had curbed some
of this progress. New rules governing air pollution have set back the strides
made by the environmental justice movement. In these trying times where clean
air is a luxury, it seems that standards have become more lenient when they
should have become more stringent. Environment justice should be a right for
all, and not just for the upper class of society.
What
is environmental justice?
Environmental
justice are inequitable environment burdens borne by racial minorities and
communities and those of low socioeconomic status. These people and communities
often are treated unfairly as their environment is compromised by decision
makers who may designate their neighborhoods for disposal of waste and pollutants
which prove harmful to those living within the area.
Bullard, Robert D. “Environmental Justice for All.” Sources: Selection in Environmental Studies. Ed. Thomas Easton. United States, 2014. 170-172.
No comments:
Post a Comment