Every now and then,
world leaders converge to discuss the current issues regarding the environment
and global climate change. They discuss a shift away from fossil fuels to
renewable energy, and enter agreements to cut back emissions by a certain
percentage. Jacobson and Delucchi suggests that by finding new methods and
developing technologies that already exist, we are able to become 100%
independent from the use of fossil fuels.
It is
a bold endeavor, one that has been in the fold for over a decade, and complicated
from a logistical point of view. A Stanford University study had determined the
impact of global warming supplied by current available energies. The best
options that had little impact on climate were wind, water, and sunlight, what
they have labeled WWS energy. The energies which had major impact—not surprisingly—were
nuclear, coal, ethanol, oil and natural gas. By trading these carbon emitting energies
with renewable energy, the fight to curb climate change may not be an
impossible task.
But
replacing our current energy systems with WWS options requires a major overhaul
of our current practices. The massive scale of the project requires a
coordinated effort from world nations embracing a community model of energy.
The plan would call for millions of wind turbines and new power plants that run
strictly on solar power. If it were possible to achieve the desired goals
proposed by Jacobson and Delucchi, it would ultimately depend on the
technologies implemented, and the “availability of critical materials, and
economic and political factors.”
There
are, however, certain obstacles which stand in the way; the infrastructure and
scope of the project is not the barrier, but the availability of limited or
scarce materials which pose a greater challenge. The lack of rare-earth metals like
lithium can impede the production of battery cells used in electric vehicles,
and other metals such as neodymium used for wind turbines can be in short
supply. Assuming we are able to replace the existing model of energy with new infrastructure
that is reliable in providing clean energy, the rewards can surpass our wildest
expectations. WWS technologies can drive down the price of energy to less than the
current price of coal, and the “cost of capital, land, operations, maintenance,
and energy storage will help offset intermittent supply, and transmission.”
The
analysis of new energy resources provided by Jacobson and Dulucchi suggests
that the costs of WWS will be competitive with current sources of energy. The
initial cost may seem steep—but in the long run, the benefits outweigh the
negatives. It will take changes in political policies (which may include
removing tax benefits for current industry, and providing subsidies to developing technologies) and
the phasing out of burning fossil fuel to alternative clean energy. With good
policies in place, ones with clear objective goals for the future, it is not
impossible to be completely independent of carbon emitting energy in the span
of 20 to 30 years—if we are aggressive. The obstacles in the way do not stem
from a lack of technical know-how, but rest solely on political motives of nations
around the world.
Critical Thinking: What
is the most effective way to cut back on greenhouse gas emissions?
There are many ways where we can cut back on the
amount of greenhouse gas emissions released into the atmosphere. In the highest
level, it would involve putting policies in place which would discourage
companies and corporations from over-polluting, such as a carbon tax. Subsidies
can also be provided to new developing technologies in order to transition away
from the burning of fossil fuels. Educating people of the detrimental effects
greenhouse gases have on the environment provide another means in the efforts
to curb climate change by developing a more intimate connection to the natural
world. When it comes to the individual, finding other means of transportation
as an effective alternative to getting around can also help the growing problem
of greenhouse gases released in the air. The most important step is admitting
there is a problem.
Works Cited
Mark Z. Jacobson and Mark A. Delucchi. “A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030.” Sources: Selections in Environmental Studies. Ed. Thomas Easton. United States, 2014. 73-75.
No comments:
Post a Comment